Home News Progressive News

Progressive news

Irvine May Day supports the People’s Charter.

Speaking at Saturday’s May Day rally in Irvine, The RMT’s Phil McGarry was applauded as he stated the aims of the People’s Charter http://www.thepeoplescharter.org/- an end to cuts in public services, investment in jobs, public ownership of the railways and other utilities, and the repeal of anti-union laws. Decent jobs and services could be funded by genuine progressive taxation, dealing with tax avoiders and bringing the troops home. His call for making the rich pay their dues was echoed by Louise McDaid of the Farepak campaign. She said that ‘the rogue Farepak’s former Directors should be made to pay. Just being banned from future Directorships was not good enough. No one had received any compensation to date while the fees for the Farepak’s administration had risen to more than £8 millions.  This is much more than the thousands of victims will ever receive.”

John Jamieson of the PCS said that his members were facing pension cuts as the Government did cosy deals with tax dodging companies. “It’s rank hypocrisy for the UK government to pursue the ordinary people of Iceland for £2 billions when it has let Vodafone off a £6 billion tax bill”, he said.

Wael Shawish from Palestine Solidarity spoke of the struggle in his homeland:  “East Jerusalem had become a prison with an open door, Palestinians had a choice to stay in terrible conditions or to leave and never return”. He called for the sanction campaign against Israel’s policies to be stepped up. The issue was brought home when local man Jim Henry spoke of his abusive treatment by the Israel authorities during a recent solidarity visit to Palestine.

Irvine’s May Day march and rally is now in its twenty second year.

irvine may day 2012

 

Scots tell Tories where to go

Scottish trade unionists told the Tories to get out of the country on Sunday with a thousand-strong demo outside the Scottish Conservatives' conference in Troon.

A group of protesters expressed their anger with the party by marching past shouting: "Tory scum."

Police had to cage the Conservative members behind security fencing after several younger demonstrators stopped to voice their disgust at the cuts and let off a flare, prior to joining a rally at the seafront.

Organised by the STUC, the demonstration highlighted soaring youth unemployment in Scotland, which has reached 103,000.

STUC president Mike Kirby urged people to punish the Tories at the May elections for producing a "wrecking budget" earlier this week.

Mr Kirby told the Star that the STUC had drawn up an alternative budget stressing investment in Scottish manufacturing and construction.

STUC youth committee vice-chairwoman Kirsty Connell drew roars of approval after declaring to the government: "Let young people work and they will build a better society. This is about the fight for jobs, fight for young workers and all workers."

Various political parties and anti-cuts groups were also represented on the demonstration.

Communist Party of Britain Scottish secretary Tommy Morrison said: "Today is an expression of our disgust at our youngsters being put on the scrapheap."

The peaceful and upbeat demonstration was marred by a police crackdown after the march ended with the kettling of 50 young protesters.

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/news/content/view/full/117032

 

Explained: The SNP versus Westminster

westminster snpSuddenly we are in the middle of a constitutional crisis.

On Monday (9 Jan) David Cameron demanded that Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond hold a snap referendum on Scottish independence.

The following day Con-Dem Scottish Secretary Michael Moore announced that the referendum would be under UK jurisdiction, legally binding and solely for and against independence.

At first sight these challenges to the SNP government may appear both strange and provocative. They are certainly fateful.

But there is an explanation. It can be found in a little-noticed event which occurred in a committee room of the Scottish Parliament just 10 days before Christmas.

Read more...

 

United we are stronger - On Scottish Independence & PM Cameron Row

morning star logo smallIf David Cameron is sincere in his protestations of not wanting to see Scotland leave the UK, he should abandon efforts to meddle in a question proper to Scottish voters.

Alex Salmond has previously noted that interference in the consultation process by Westminster would prove a boon for those seeking independence, which seems self-evident.

Tories are deservedly an endangered species in Scotland, so the suggestion that Scottish voters may need protecting from themselves by Cameron stretches credibility.

The demand for a reScotland ferendum on independence is a Scottish National Party policy. None of the unionist parties at Westminster or Holyrood projected such an initiative.

So proposals from them to order a vote earlier than planned by the Scottish government or to impose the terms of the question(s) to be put before the electorate would be seen clearly for what they are - an attempt to scupper the democratic process.

davidcameronhomeofficeWhen Cameron offers a "fair, legal and decisive" solution to this or any other political issue, hackles rise.

Far from fairness, what the Tory leader is about is attempting to take control of a process in order to deliver an outcome acceptable to his party or to its corporate backers.

Cameron's spokesman blew the gaff in saying that "business" was worried about whether Scotland would remain in the UK, affecting its readiness to invest.

"That uncertainty can have a detrimental impact on the economy and that is why he is saying that he thinks we need to get on with this sooner rather than later," he added.

The Westminster-based parties have to accept that they lost the Scottish parliamentary elections. The SNP has an overall majority and democracy dictates that it should decide when its proposal should be put before the Scottish electorate.

If and when that time comes and there is one question facing voters - a straight Yes or No to Scotland leaving the UK - the Morning Star will advocate a No vote.

This is based on our paper's traditional position of backing devolution within Britain rather than secession, supporting socialism and the essential role of working-class unity throughout Britain to achieve this.

England, Wales and Scotland do not have separate ruling classes. The British ruling class is united and powerful. Combating it requires similar unity and strength on the part of working people.

The SNP parliamentary majority at Holyrood confers on the nationalist party the right to govern, but its leadership knows that not every vote it received can be translated into a firm declaration for national independence.

bankerMany of its votes, especially from working people, were cast in response to a feeling of having been let down by the pro-banker policies of new Labour at Westminster, echoed by its Scottish franchise.

This process was enhanced by the confident and accomplished nature of its leadership, which contrasted with the shambles that was Scottish Labour.

However, Salmond's advocacy of a northern European "arc of prosperity" looks far less attractive now, as does his intention of slashing corporation tax and offering other sweeteners to lure overseas "investors."

The Morning Star believes that Scotland's working people have more to gain from standing alongside their Welsh and English brothers and sisters to defeat the Con-Dem coalition and fight for socialist change rather than from embracing the SNP strategy of a Scottish tax haven at the service of capitalist speculators.


Editorial Comment 10 Jan http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/news/content/view/full/113956

 

The anger of workers can't be edited out - The battle begins tomorrow #n30.

morning star logo smallUnions are accused of "walking their members up the hill" for battle and playing brinkmanship with the government "while negotiations are still ongoing."

Cries of illegitimacy come from right-wing blogger Guido Fawkes - presumably referring to the ballot results of the three big unions peppering the 30 per cent mark.

Of course there is no recognition that the government gained power propped up by the Lib Dems with around 36 per cent of the public vote.

More ridiculous was the Daily Mail's assertion that tomorrow's walkouts represent the start of "months" of strike action.

How ironic that many lay members would welcome that if it were true, albeit for reasons of convincing the government to back down rather than "holding the country to ransom" as right-wing ranters would have us believe.

And union leaders are portrayed as "bosses and barons" ordering their lot into an unjust and selfish fight, neglecting to explain that lay members voted for action and will be the ones putting themselves in harm's way to defend their hard-won pension rights.

Some obscure non-unionised private-sector workers have been rolled out to play the role of kow-towing servants - grateful for their own measly pension arrangements while castigating public-sector workers for wanting to maintain a decent standard of living in retirement.

What is missing from this coverage is the public-sector workers themselves.

Who are these people who empty our bins, keep our elderly safe, heal our sick and protect our communities?

Why would such people - doing jobs that engender a different kind of ethos to work, one of service and commitment - want to withdraw their labour on such a mass scale?

I caught up with Unite members at a strategy meeting in Bristol recently to try to understand the reasons why.

Branch secretary for Unite at Plymouth and city council Diane Beals doesn't consider herself a militant trade unionist.

But the pension changes were just the latest pinch for an already undermined workforce.

n30"People are suffering already," she says.

"We have endured a three-year pay freeze, had terms and conditions slashed and overtime has been cut.

"The pensions is just the next thing on the horizon."

Anger is palpable in her region, she continues, but that doesn't always lead to an organised constructive response on November 30, she warns.

"There are various pockets such as street-sweeping where members are angry.

"But bluff and bluster is one thing. Whether they deliver on the day is another."

However Beals believes ministers have misjudged public-sector workers and popular opinion, mistakenly seeing people like her and colleagues as a soft option to dish out austerity to.

"They have assumed we would not take action," she says.

"And the action itself will involve the public, as many schools will be hit. It will become a family day out."

Despite 24 unions being involved in the action, media scare stories have revolved around teachers, UK Border Agency staff and council workers.

But what about the Ministry of Defence?

Jan Fellows, a supervisor for the MoD guard service, believes that Unite is mixing the old with the new in a positive way.

"General secretary Len McCluskey is from the old school," she says with a beaming smile.

"To me he is a leader like from the '70s and now he is passing all that knowledge on to us."

But interestingly despite this enthusiastic endorsement of Unite's leader, she remains cautious about herself being branded a "militant" trade unionist.

"The union has a role to play in building community opposition to the cuts," she says.

"The public need to know that it's the ones in the union that need that backing and that November 30 is just the starter of what we are doing."

Fellows points out that a unique facet of this action is how women will be affected by the pension changes.

With so many women under the current system still failing to reach parity of pension with men in the public sector, government proposals will drive everybody to a new low.

"I will end up paying £58 a month instead of 23 and end up losing £7,000 in my pension" she says.

But Fellows retains her optimism in being able to fight back, highlighting history and the groundwork done by reps in branches.

"We have being fighting since Pankhurst for pensions - to get equality with men," she says.

"With new members who have problems we sit them down, show them past case works, grievances and how we have won bullying and harassment actions, showing that you can't lose your jobs 'just like that' because a manager says so. This is all part of mobilising people."

Members are all too aware of their union's strong backing of the Labour Party and its current leader Ed Miliband.

But what has also not gone unnoticed is his refusal to back the action this Wednesday.

Secretary of Dorset County Council Paul Kimber believes that only trade unionists on the ground can convince Miliband to change tack.

"Ed will see the power of feeling of trade union movement," he says confidently.

"This will be one of many strikes and days of actions. If he is not convinced now he will be later."

Although not calling for Unite to cease funding for Labour, he adds that fellow workers are becoming politicised elsewhere.

"Trade unionists are working with all left parties, including the Communist Party.

"There are other economic arguments and that is something that needs to be taken into the Labour Party."

Whatever the coverage or media perspective on the day, a camera or a newspaper cannot edit out the anger of workers, of their families or those affected by the strike.

The battle begins tomorrow.

http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/news/content/view/full/112492


 
More Articles...
Upcoming Events
English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish

scottish morning star supporters